Switching Primary Federal Regulators: Is it Beneficial for U. S. Banks?

Switching Primary Federal Regulators: Is it Beneficial for U. S. Banks?
TUDzKA6Bgs8C
18
By:"Richard J. Rosen"

Published on 2008-08 by DIANE Publishing

2001 '79 '81 '83 '85 '87 '89 '91 '93 '95 '97 '99 '03 Performance of \u003cb\u003ebanks\u003c/b\u003e prior to \u003cbr\u003e\nswitching regulators aThe Sharpe ratio ... the cost of \u003cb\u003eexams\u003c/b\u003e (or if, because of \u003cbr\u003e\ncompetition in \u003cb\u003ebanking\u003c/b\u003e, a \u003cb\u003ebank\u003c/b\u003e feels it has to squeeze out additional cost savings\u003cbr\u003e\n).

READ NOW

Examines the impact of switching primary federal regulators on banks¿ return and risk, using data from 1977 to 2001. Return increases and risk changes minimally for banks that switch regulators from 1992 to 2003, while there is no significant change in either return or risk for banks switching earlier. The improved performance at banks switching between 1992 and 2003 is evidence for beneficial competition among regulators, and the absence of an increase in risk throughout the sample period is inconsistent with a ¿race for the bottom¿ among regulators. Tables and graphs.

This Book was ranked 35 by Google Books for keyword banking exams.

The book is written in enfor NOT_MATURE

Read Ebook Now
false
true

Printed Version of this book available in
BOOK

Availability of Ebook version is true,"listPrice": {"amount": 14.95,"currencyCode": "USD"in falseor true

Public Domain Status false

Rating by

SAMPLE

false

To Get More Banking Ebooks Click Here